Legal Opinion
Vilas v. Seith
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided March 24, 1936PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSlack, J.
After an opinion was handed down in this case plaintiff asked and had leave to reargue the case, pending which the entry order has been withheld.
The suit is in equity brought under P. L. 2293 to set aside a conveyance of real estate alleged to be in fraud of plaintiff’s rights as a creditor of defendant Seith. Cummings did not appear and as to him the bill was taken as confessed. Seith appeared and filed an answer denying each and every allegation of the bill. The case was heard on the merits by a chancellor who found and stated the facts, and entered a decree thereon dismissing the bill as…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Ga Nun v. . PalmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- O'Boyle v. Parker-Young Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1921
- Cummings v. Connecticut General Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1928
- Rice v. Bennington County Savings BankSupreme Court of Vermont · 1920
- Clifford v. West Hartford Creamery Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1931
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Shea v. PiletteSupreme Court of Vermont · 1937
- Becker v. BeckerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1980
- Glass v. Newport Clothing Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1939
- Spencer v. Lyman Falls Power Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1938
- Hunt v. Spaulding Et UxSupreme Court of Vermont · 1936
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.