Moore v. Murphy

SMITH, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiff filed a petition to construe decedent’s will. She sought a finding that Item 3 of the will is-void for vagueness. The Probate Division of the Circuit Court found the clause valid and held that it was unnecessary to construe the meaning of the words in question. Plaintiff appeals the trial court’s decision. We affirm.

Luther S. Moore, decedent, executed a handwritten will on September 2, 1982. Item 2 of the will put all of decedent’s assets *137in trust and named John T. Murphy (Trustee) as Trustee. Trustee was to distribute the income from the assets to relatives,…