Legal Opinion

Meyers v. Wells

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 1948PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarlow, J.

The first question is whether appellant adopted the contract entered into between Wells and Meyers. It must be conceded that Wells entered into this contract in order to obtain Meyers’ services to manage the coal company, wherein he was to be the majority stockholder of a family corporation, where Meyers was the only outside stockholder, all stockholders being officers of the corporation. Appellant relies on the fact that the board of directors of the corporation, never took any action adopting the Wells-Meyers contract and never agreed upon the compensation which Meyers was to receive. It is…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Appleton Waterworks Co. v. City of AppletonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Kellogg v. Citizens Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Dickinson v. Norwegian Plow Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Pratt v. Oshkosh Match Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Thomsen v. OlsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Dairyland Greyhound Park, Inc. v. DoyleWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Anthony Gagliano & Co., Inc. v. Openfirst, LLCWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Anthony Gagliano & Co. v. Openfirst, LLCCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2013
  4. Brandenburg v. SF & G. CO., INC.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1955
  5. Conway v. MarachowskyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API