Legal Opinion
Queal v. Perales
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 13, 1984PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Edward F. McLaughlin, J.
This is an action for declaratory and injunctive relief in which the plaintiff challenges the constitutional validity and application of defendants’ administrative regulation 18 NYCRR 352.29 (h), the so-called “lump sum rule”. Defendant Perales here moves for summary judgment dismissing the action, and the plaintiff has cross-moved for summary judgment on behalf of her dependent child, Heather, age three.
The facts are not in dispute. On or about September 24, 1983, Diana Queal made an initial application for public assistance benefits on behalf of…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- King v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Wyman v. JamesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- People v. RyanNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- People Ex Rel. Westchester Fire Insurance v. DavenportNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- Tucker v. ToiaNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Porter v. D'EliaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Queal v. PeralesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986