Legal Opinion
Petroleum Workers Union of the Republic of Mexico v. Gomez
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided September 8, 2016No. 14-14-00807-CV, NO. 14-14-00834-CVPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Martha Hill Jamison, Justice
Who, if anyone, speaks for a Mexican union when the union leadership is mired in scandal? That is the central question in this three-way appeal concerning enforcement of a purported 2004 settlement agreement (the “Garnished Funds Agreement”) attempting to finally resolve 30 years of litigation. Among other things, the Garnished Funds Agreement provided for the distribution of certain garnished funds held in a New York bank account between the Petroleum Workers Union of the Republic of Mexico (the “Union”) and James Gomez, as receiver for Arriba Limited…
2Cases cited58 opinions
- City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
- Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- Cain v. BainTexas Supreme Court · 1986
- Valence Operating Co. v. DorsettTexas Supreme Court · 2005
- BMC Software Belgium, NV v. MarchandTexas Supreme Court · 2002
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Kubbernus v. ECAL Partners, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2018
- Central Petroleum Limited v. Geoscience Resource Recovery, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2018
- Sohani v. SunesaraCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2018
- Scott Van Dyke v. Builders West, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2018
- CR Trade Financing, LLC v. Juan Diego Zelaya Aguilar, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2026
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.