Legal Opinion

Bicking v. City of Minneapolis

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 15, 2017No. A16-1379Published

1Dissent 1

*316DISSENT

2Dissent · StrasStras, Justice

In an alleged effort to improve policing and police accountability within the City of Minneapolis, a group of citizens sought to include a proposed amendment to Minneapolis’s City Charter on the general-election ballot. The amendment would have required police officers to, among other things, procure professional-liability insurance. Even though the group satisfied all of the procedural requirements for placement of the question on the general-election ballot, the Minneapolis City Council struck the question based on an opinion by the City Attorney that the proposed amendment would, if…

3Cases cited27 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. RiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Hayburn's CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1792
  3. Lee v. DelmontSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  4. In re the Senate of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1865
  5. Coppernoll v. ReedWashington Supreme Court · 2005

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API