Legal Opinion
City of Eugene v. State
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided August 11, 2005No. CC 99C-12794; CC 99C-12838; CC 99C-20235; CC 00C-16173; CA A121400; SC S50617Published
1Opinion of the Court
117 P.3d 1001 (2005)
339 Or. 113
CITY OF EUGENE, a municipal corporation, Petitioner-Respondent,
v.
STATE of Oregon, PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT BOARD, Respondent-Respondent, and
Karen Jenkins, Diane Davidson, Arlyn Stepper, Gary Gillespie, Ann Montague, Judith Ann Sugnet, Gary Nauta, and Roger Garver, Intervenors-Appellants.
Lane County, City of Eugene, Multnomah County, City of Portland, City of Roseburg, City of Huntington, and Canby Utility Board, municipal corporations, Petitioners-Respondents,
v.
State of Oregon, Respondent-Respondent, and
State of Oregon, by and through Public Employees…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Brumnett v. Psychiatric Security Review BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Yancy v. ShatzerOregon Supreme Court · 2004
- Hamel v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 2000
- Edmunson v. Department of Insurance & FinanceOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- City of Eugene v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 2005