Legal Opinion
Williams v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided April 3, 1956No. 22-55PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMaddeN, Judge
The plaintiff was an employee of the Reconstruction Finance Corporation, holding a position which is included in the classified civil service. On November 25, 1951, he was discharged, allegedly for cause. He asserts in his petition that his discharge was an arbitrary and capricious act, and that it was in violation of procedural provisions of the applicable statute and of regulations of the Civil Service Commission.
The plaintiff filed a suit in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia against Harry A. McDonald, Administrator, Reconstruction Finance Corporation, seeking…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cherry Cotton Mills, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- National Cored Forgings Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1955
- Williams v. CravensCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
- Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. LanghamCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1953
- Langham v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1952
3Cited by5 opinions
- John P. King v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
- White v. BloombergDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1972
- Larsen v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1959
- Green v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1959
- Costar v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981