Legal Opinion

Larsen v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided March 4, 1959No. 9-58PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLaramore, Judge

This is a suit by four veterans’ preference eligible employees of the Veterans Administration seeking back pay on the allegation that the defendant violated their reduction-in-force preferential retention rights under section 12 of the Veterans’ Preference Act, as amended, 5 U.S.C. § 861. Defendant has not filed an answer to the petition, but has moved the court under Eule 51 for a summary judgment on the grounds that (1) section 12 of the Act, supra, does not apply to these plaintiffs and (2) that plaintiffs have already litigated this issue in a court of competent jurisdiction and under the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. O'Brien v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953
  2. Frederick J. Cutting v. Harvey v. Higley, Administrator of Veterans' AffairsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
  3. Williams v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. John P. King v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
  2. Bogart v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
  3. Technograph Printed Circuits, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
  4. Kempinski v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
  5. Bass v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API