Caragulian v. Rudd
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtLummus, J.
This is an action of contract to recover the balance due upon a judgment against the defendants, who are husband and wife. The husband was defaulted. The wife defends on the ground that the plaintiff accepted a partial payment made by her “by her husband,” and the husband’s notes for the balance due upon the judgment, and not only said that he would release the wife but signed an unsealed paper reciting that in consideration of the partial payment the plaintiff agreed to accept it in full satisfaction of his judgment against her, reserving, however, the right to hold the husband upon the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Millett v. TempleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
- Barnett v. RosenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
- Rosenblatt v. Holstein Rubber Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
- Shumaker v. Lucerne-in-Maine Community Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- Bascombe v. InferreraMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Emerson v. DemingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- First National Bank v. CartoniMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
- Bosworth v. BosworthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
- Swartz v. ClaytonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
- Abramson v. Melannie Corp.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1947