Legal Opinion

Abramson v. Melannie Corp.

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided May 15, 1947Published

1Opinion of the CourtRollins, J.

This is an action of contract in which the plaintiff seeks to recover the balance due for labor and materials furnished in the repair of a fishing* vessel.

The answer is a general denial, plea of payment, and accord and satisfaction.

The evidence tended to show the following facts:

The plaintiff repairs gasoline engines. One Paul Alpert owned a fishing vessel named “Josephine and Mary.” In August, 1943, Alpert employed the plaintiff to make rather extensive repairs to the engine of this boat. While the work was going on Alpert sold the vessel to the defendant corporation. A stockholder of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Schuttinger v. WoodruffNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
  3. Worcester Color Co. v. Henry Wood's Sons Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  4. Whittaker Chain Tread Co. v. Standard Auto Supply Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  5. Rosenblatt v. Holstein Rubber Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API