Legal Opinion
State v. Taggart
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided December 27, 1971No. C-70-11-0387PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSchwab, C.J.
After being indicted for armed robbery, ORS 163.280, defendant filed a pretrial motion to suppress all evidence seized during three separate searches, one of which was a warrantless search of his apartment. The trial court granted defendant’s motion as to the search of his apartment, ① and the state has appealed this determination pursuant to OES 138.060 (4).
The issue is whether defendant’s landlady had the authority to consent to a warrantless search of defendant’s apartment.
The search in question occurred the morning of November 5, 1970. Defendant was not present at his apartment at that…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Abel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Chapman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- State v. KeithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. CoyleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
- State v. JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
- United States v. BotelhoDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1973
- State v. TaggartCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
- State v. JacquesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2019
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.