Legal Opinion

Great Western Bank v. Converse Consultants, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 17, 1997No. B109424PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GRIGNON, J.

A cross-defendant enters into a good faith settlement with the plaintiffs, agreeing to pay the plaintiffs a sum of money which will offset any judgments the plaintiffs obtain against the defendant and cross-complainant. The trial court dismisses the cross-complaints and awards the cross-defendant its costs. The cross-complainant appeals the award of costs, contending it is the prevailing party on the cross-complaints in light of the fact that it obtained a net monetary recovery by virtue of the offset of the cross-defendant’s settlement from the plaintiffs’ judgments against…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ladas v. California State Automobile Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  2. Syverson v. HeitmannCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  3. Zamora v. Shell Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1997
  4. Pirkig v. DennisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  5. Greshko v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Goodman v. LozanoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Chinn v. KMR Property ManagementCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  3. Employers Mutual Casualty Co. v. Philadelphia Indemnity InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  4. Wakefield v. BohlinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  5. Wade v. SchraderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API