Great Western Bank v. Converse Consultants, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GRIGNON, J.
A cross-defendant enters into a good faith settlement with the plaintiffs, agreeing to pay the plaintiffs a sum of money which will offset any judgments the plaintiffs obtain against the defendant and cross-complainant. The trial court dismisses the cross-complaints and awards the cross-defendant its costs. The cross-complainant appeals the award of costs, contending it is the prevailing party on the cross-complaints in light of the fact that it obtained a net monetary recovery by virtue of the offset of the cross-defendant’s settlement from the plaintiffs’ judgments against…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ladas v. California State Automobile Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Syverson v. HeitmannCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Zamora v. Shell Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1997
- Pirkig v. DennisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Greshko v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Goodman v. LozanoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- Chinn v. KMR Property ManagementCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Employers Mutual Casualty Co. v. Philadelphia Indemnity InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Wakefield v. BohlinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Wade v. SchraderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.