Smith v. Freng
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
The following opinion was filed June 5, 1923:
ViNjE, C. J.
We shall not enter into a discussion of all the questions rdised and argued upon the appeal because in *352our view many of them become immaterial because of the conclusion we have reached that the evidence does not sustain the finding that a contract for any specific sum as compensation for services was ever entered into by the plaintiff and decedent. As evidence tending to sustain the verdict of the jury in finding that a contract for $3,000 had been entered into, the plaintiff relies upon the testimony of several witnesses. These…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Estate of KesslerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1894
- Taylor v. ThiemanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
- Laughnan v. Estate of LaughnanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1917
3Cited by6 opinions
- Tollackson v. SveenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
- Estate of NaleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
- Estate of Anderson v. RockWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943
- Teynor v. TeynorWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
- Estate of FickWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.