Legal Opinion

Estate of Anderson v. Rock

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1943PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, C. J.

Appellant’s first contention is that the evidence does not sustain the finding of the court as to the extent and value of services rendered by the wife to the husband. After a careful éxamination and consideration of the record, it is considered that the evidence sustains the finding made by the trial court as to the extent and value of the services rendered. No useful purpose will be served by setting out the evidence in detail.

Appellant’s second contention is that so much of the claim as arose more than six years prior to the death of the husband is barred by sec. 330.19, Stats., commonly…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Estate of KesslerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Laughnan v. Estate of LaughnanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Kessler v. OlenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Klug v. SoldnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Hauser v. FetzerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Matter of Estate of SteffesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  2. In Matter of Estate of SteffesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API