Legal Opinion

State v. Langston

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1971No. State 50PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHanley, J.

Two issues are presented in this appeal:(1) May an allegedly improper jury instruction be collaterally attacked under sec. 974.06, Stats.; and(2) Is the defendant entitled to a new trial because of the allegedly erroneous instruction?

TJse of see. 97U.06, Stats.

The judicial council, commenting on the enactment of the postconviction relief statute, stated:

“This represents the first Wisconsin attempt at a comprehensive post-conviction statute which will afford an all encompassing remedy for defendants challenging their convictions. It is taken directly from Title 28, USC, s. 2255. The section is…

2Cited by20 opinions

  1. Peterson v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  2. State Ex Rel. Kanieski v. GagnonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Bergenthal v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  4. State v. SchliseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Loop v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API