State v. Langston
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHanley, J.
Two issues are presented in this appeal:(1) May an allegedly improper jury instruction be collaterally attacked under sec. 974.06, Stats.; and(2) Is the defendant entitled to a new trial because of the allegedly erroneous instruction?
TJse of see. 97U.06, Stats.
The judicial council, commenting on the enactment of the postconviction relief statute, stated:
“This represents the first Wisconsin attempt at a comprehensive post-conviction statute which will afford an all encompassing remedy for defendants challenging their convictions. It is taken directly from Title 28, USC, s. 2255. The section is…
2Cited by20 opinions
- Peterson v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
- State Ex Rel. Kanieski v. GagnonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
- Bergenthal v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. SchliseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- Loop v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.