Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Kanieski v. Gagnon

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1972No. State 122PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkie, J.

Two issues are presented by this petition:

1. What is the scope of this court’s review in this habeas corpus proceeding?

2. Was the evidence sufficient to sustain the conviction?

Scope of review.

An action for habeas corpus is a collateral proceeding which normally can be used to raise questions concerning the jurisdiction of the convicting court, the validity of the conviction as against a charge that the law under which the defendant was convicted is void, and constitutional defects in the conviction process; it is normally not used to raise such questions as the sufficiency of the evidence.5

In…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Bautista v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  4. State v. BrodsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  5. State v. DavidsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Peterson v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  2. State v. BurkmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. KilloryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  4. State Ex Rel. Hussong v. FroelichWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Wagner v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API