Legal Opinion

McFadden v. Ross

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 1883No. 10,230PublishedCited by 9 opinions

From the Shelby Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtNiblack, C. J.

— This was a proceeding to remove an administrator. The petition stated that James B. McFadden was, on the 26th day of March, 1880, by the Shelby Circuit Court, appointed administrator of the estate of Joseph Nichols, deceased, and that he lawfully qualified as such administrator; that James R. Ross and John B. Stumph, two of the petitioners, had, in a certain action, recovered a judgment against the said MeFadden, as administrator of said estate, for costs of suit amounting to the sum of $5.40; that Emil Fritz, Fedor Fritz, Otto Fritz and Richard Fritz, the remaining petitioners, had, also,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Puett v. BeardIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Williams v. TobiasIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Vail v. GivanIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Ewing v. EwingIndiana Supreme Court · 1871

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In re Holladay's EstateOregon Supreme Court · 1889
  2. State, Ex Rel. Cassel v. JohnstonIndiana Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Hofer v. GofnerOregon Supreme Court · 1930
  4. State Ex Rel. Ripa v. Lake Superior CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Diedrich v. WayIndiana Court of Appeals · 1918

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API