In Re Scarborough
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
By means of habeas corpus the petitioner seeks to obtain his release on probation from the county jail in San Joaquin County on the ground that his probation was illegally revoked because he violated a provision of the judgment granting probation under section 1203.1 of the Penal Code, that it would be suspended in part on condition that he leave Stockton and San Joaquin County and remain away for a period of two years. After serving imprisonment for about three months, the defendant was, on April 26, 1946, released on parole. The order granting parole did not contain the provision that the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. BaumMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
- In Re HerronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- In Re PetersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- In Re GianniniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
- People v. FickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- People v. DominguezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Bird v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
- Franklin v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1964
- People v. BlakemanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- State v. MorganSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1980
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.