Legal Opinion

People v. Fick

California Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 1891No. 20745PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Joaquin County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtDe Haven, J.

— The defendant, H. L. Ficlc, was indicted by a grand jury of San Joaquin County for the *147crime of kidnaping. Upon his trial the jury found him guilty as charged. His motion for a new trial was denied, and judgment given that he be imprisoned in the state prison for eight years, and that he pay the district attorney a fee of twenty-five dollars.

From this judgment and the order denying his motion for a new trial, the defendant appeals.

It was shown upon the trial that the defendant was, at the date of the alleged commission of the offense charged, a constable of township No. 3, Placer County,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ex parte SternesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Phillips v. FaddenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. People v. JablonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  2. In Re ScarboroughCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  3. People v. SheasbeyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  4. People v. MajorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  5. People v. NorthcottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API