State v. Biggs
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1DissentDeviN, J.
It was within the province of the trial judge to determine whether the admissions of guilt on the part of the defendants, offered in evidence, were voluntarily made, or were induced by promises of leniency. This was a preliminary question of fact for his decision. Before ruling thereon, in accord with correct procedure, in the absence of the jury, the judge heard all the testimony of the defendants and of the State’s witnesses bearing on the competency of this evidence. He was in position to judge of the credibility of those who deposed in his presence. It was his duty to determine and to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. . AndersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
- State v. . WhitenerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
- State v. . HairstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- State v. Andrew.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1867
- State v. . LivingstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.