Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Blunt

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 17, 1986No. E002896PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RICKLES, J.

The issues presented by this appeal concern the determination of presentence custody credits.

Defendant Roosevelt Blunt entered a plea of guilty to one count of maintaining a place for sale or use of a controlled substance (Health & Saf. Code, § 11366). Imposition of sentence was suspended and probation was granted for a period of three years. Approximately one year later defendant’s probation was revoked following his conviction for two drug-related offenses in Los Angeles County. Defendant was sentenced to state prison for a term of two years, with presentence credit of 128…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re AtilesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  2. People v. MathewsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  3. People v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  4. People v. RossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  5. In Re NolascoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. AdrianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  2. People v. CallejasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  3. People v. Santa AnaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  4. United States v. Juan Carlos Huerta-Moran, Also Known as Francisco LozanoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
  5. People v. PurvisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API