Legal Opinion

People v. Purvis

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 18, 1992No. Docket Nos. A055866, A055867PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BENSON, J.

Jereld Edwin Purvis (sometimes spelled “Jerald” in the record) was charged with passing a forged check and stealing an automobile. During most of the pendency of the case he was confined on the basis of a parole revocation which rested partly on these same offenses. After he pleaded guilty to these charges, the trial court refused to allow more than one day’s credit for the presentence confinement. Defendant asserts that this was error. We reaffirm our holding in In re Nickles (1991) 231 Cal.App.3d 415 [282 Cal.Rptr. 411], review denied, that the defendant bears the burden of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re AtilesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  2. In Re JoynerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  3. People v. HuffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  4. In Re NicklesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  5. People v. BluntCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. BrunerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. People v. ShabazzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API