Legal Opinion

In Re Nolasco

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 16, 1986No. A026987PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

NEWSOM, J.

The People have appealed from judgments granting respondents’ petitions for writs of habeas corpus directing the release of respondents from prison on the ground that the extension of their parole revocation release dates pursuant to subdivision (c) of Penal Code section 3057 1 (hereafter subdivision (c)), amounted to unconstitutional ex post facto punishment. (U.S. Const., art. I, § 10; Cal. Const., art. I, § 9.) The People also seek reversal of the trial court’s order enjoining application of section 3057, subdivision (c) to any similarly situated prisoners—i.e., prisoners…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. In Re RamirezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  3. In Re LeDayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. John L. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State v. MonsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  3. People v. CallejasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  4. People v. BluntCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  5. John L. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API