In Re Nolasco
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NEWSOM, J.
The People have appealed from judgments granting respondents’ petitions for writs of habeas corpus directing the release of respondents from prison on the ground that the extension of their parole revocation release dates pursuant to subdivision (c) of Penal Code section 3057 1 (hereafter subdivision (c)), amounted to unconstitutional ex post facto punishment. (U.S. Const., art. I, § 10; Cal. Const., art. I, § 9.) The People also seek reversal of the trial court’s order enjoining application of section 3057, subdivision (c) to any similarly situated prisoners—i.e., prisoners…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- In Re RamirezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- In Re LeDayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
3Cited by8 opinions
- John L. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. MonsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- People v. CallejasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- People v. BluntCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- John L. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.