Barrett v. Fondren
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Per curiam
There is but one question sought to be presented on this appeal: that is, whether *539the suit involves a claim within the non-claim statute which is Title 61, section 211, Code of 1940. The first count of the complaint claims damages for injuries to the person and property of plaintiff, and alleges that he was permanently injured; that he was made sick and sore and caused to suffer great physical pain and mental anguish, and to incur expense and loss of time from his work as a proximate consequence of the negligence of defendant’s intestate causing a collision of two automobiles. This is alleged…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Frei v. BrownleeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1952
- Davis v. ShepardWashington Supreme Court · 1925
- Pierce v. Johnson, Exr.Ohio Supreme Court · 1939
- Howard v. SwiftIllinois Supreme Court · 1934
- Hammons v. HammonsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Moore v. StephensSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
- Ivory v. FitzpatrickSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
- Edwards v. VanzantSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
- Lett v. WattsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
- Myers v. RedmillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.