Legal Opinion

In Re the Last Will & Testament of Wood

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 14, 1954No. 105PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJoimsoN, J.

The respondents insist that, in the absence of a prior ruling by the Clerk of the Superior Court, Judge Bone was without jurisdictional power to hear and determine their demurrer and motion. The contention is untenable. True, the Clerk had exclusive original jurisdiction of the proceeding; that is, nothing else appearing, it was within his sole province in the first instance to determine whether the decedent Wood died testate or intestate and, if he died testate, whether the script in dispute is his will. Brissie v. Craig, 232 N.C. 701, 62 S.E. 2d 330; G.S. 2-16 (14), 28-1, and 31-12 to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Brissie v. CraigSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. Faison v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
  3. In Re Estate of Wright and Wright v. . BallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  4. In Re the Will of WallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  5. In Re the Probate of the Last Will & Testament of HineSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re Will of CharlesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  2. In Re the Will of McCauleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
  3. Morris v. MorrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  4. In Re the Will of BelvinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  5. In Re the Will of DurhamCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API