In Re the Will of Belvin
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtRodman, J.
The right to contest the validity of a writing offered for probate or probated in common form is by statute, G.S. 31-32, limited to “any person entitled under such will, or interested in the estate.”
Appellees maintain this language excludes all who would benefit by a prior testamentary disposition unless they were (1) heirs of the deceased, or (2) named as beneficiaries in the writing they seek to nullify. The court accepted appellees’ interpretation of the statute. This, we think, unduly restricts the phrase “interested in the estate.” If caveators can establish their allegations of undue…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Kennedy v. WalcuttOhio Supreme Court · 1928
- Estate of ArbuckleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Ash WillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- Low v. LowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Lillard v. TolliverTennessee Supreme Court · 1926
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- In Re Will of CharlesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Sigmund Sternberger Foundation, Inc. v. TannenbaumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- In Re the Purported Last Will & Testament of BarnesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
- Matter of Will of HesterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
- In Re the Last Will & Testament & First Codicil of AshleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.