Legal Opinion
Johnson v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided April 10, 1933No. Nos. 754, 755PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McDERMOTT, Circuit Judge.
These appeals involve the construction to be given to the second proviso to section 9 of the Act of May 27, 1908 (35 Stat. 312). That aet provided for the allotment of the lands of the Five Civilized Tribes, and placed certain restrictions on the alienation of some of the allotments. No allotments were made to the issue of tribal members born after March 4, 1906, provision for their support being made in section 9. That section first enacts that the death of an allottee shall operate to remove all restrictions upon alienation of the allottee’s land, subject however to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. RigsbySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Heckman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- United States v. NobleSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Levindale Lead & Zinc Mining Co. v. ColemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Parker v. RileySupreme Court of the United States · 1919
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Veiser v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Bailey v. BanisterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
- Whitchurch v. CrawfordCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1937
- Armstrong v. Maple Leaf Apartments, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
- Wilhoit v. Federal Deposit Ins.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1943
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.