Legal Opinion

State v. . Dickens

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 22, 1939PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendant was charged with willfully and needlessly killing a dog in violation of C. S., 4483. The jury returned a verdict of guilty, and from judgment thereon defendant appealed. The statute, C. S., 4483, makes it unlawful to "willfully injure . . . needlessly mutilate or kill . . . any useful beast or animal." The willful killing of a dog is embraced within the prohibition of the statute. S. v.Smith, 156 N.C. 628, 72 S.E. 321; S. v. Clifton, 152 N.C. 800,67 S.E. 751.

The manner and circumstances of the killing of the dog as disclosed by the evidence were not controverted. The defendant…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Foster v. . HymanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  2. State v. . DixonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1876
  3. State v. . RileySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
  4. State v. . VinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
  5. State v. . WoolardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. HalesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  2. David Thurston v. Kevin FryeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2024
  3. State v. . BakerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  4. State v. . HaydenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  5. State v. . GodwinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API