State v. . Dickens
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
The defendant was charged with willfully and needlessly killing a dog in violation of C. S., 4483. The jury returned a verdict of guilty, and from judgment thereon defendant appealed. The statute, C. S., 4483, makes it unlawful to "willfully injure . . . needlessly mutilate or kill . . . any useful beast or animal." The willful killing of a dog is embraced within the prohibition of the statute. S. v.Smith, 156 N.C. 628, 72 S.E. 321; S. v. Clifton, 152 N.C. 800,67 S.E. 751.
The manner and circumstances of the killing of the dog as disclosed by the evidence were not controverted. The defendant…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Foster v. . HymanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
- State v. . DixonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1876
- State v. . RileySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
- State v. . VinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
- State v. . WoolardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. HalesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- David Thurston v. Kevin FryeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2024
- State v. . BakerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- State v. . HaydenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
- State v. . GodwinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.