Legal Opinion

State v. . Hayden

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 13, 1944PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeviN, J.

The defendant noted exception to the following instruction given by the court to the jury:

“Therefore, if you believe all the evidence and after your having answered the first issue yes, the court charges you it would be your duty, if you believe all the evidence in this case, including that of the defendant, it would be your duty to find him guilty.”

In this instruction, given at the close of the court’s charge to the jury, there was omission to charge that the finding of guilt must be beyond a reasonable doubt. However, in a preceding portion of the charge the court had instructed the jury to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. . RileySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
  2. State v. . WhitenerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
  3. State v. . CookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  4. State v. . EllisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  5. State v. . DickensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. . MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  2. State v. EllisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  3. State v. EllisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  4. State v. . StilesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  5. State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API