Legal Opinion
Van Gee v. Korts
New York Court of Appeals
Decided November 19, 1929PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHubbs, J.
The defendant Andrew W. Korts was the owner of the Korts Dairy in the city of Rochester, engaged in distributing milk throughout the city on trucks. James E. Van Gee, the plaintiff’s intestate, was in his employ as a truck driver. There were various other truck drivers employed. The deceased was paid thirty dollars a week. His duty required him to be at the plant sometime between twelve and one o’clock each morning, in order that he might load his truck and start on his route at two o’clock.
At two o’clock on the morning of November 21, 1926, Van Gee had not reported at the plant for duty.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Donovan's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Claim of Littler v. George A. Fuller Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Claim of Kowalek v. New York Consolidated RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Tallon v. . Interborough Rapid Transit Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Rourke's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Claim of Neacosia v. New York Power AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Claim of Holcomb v. Daily NewsNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Greene v. NYC SOC SERVS.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Venho v. Ostrander Railway & Timber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1936
- In Re Spencer Kellogg & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.