Legal Opinion

Rosales v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 17, 2019No. 6/18PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGetty, J.

In this case we are asked to determine whether a witness' prior convictions for committing a violent crime in aid of racketeering in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1959 ("VICAR offenses") are admissible for witness impeachment under Maryland Rule 5-609. Specifically, the Defendant sought to impeach the State's witness with the witness' conviction of conspiracy to commit assault with a dangerous weapon in aid of racketeering and threatening to commit a crime of violence in aid of racketeering. We hold that a witness' prior convictions for VICAR offenses are admissible for witness impeachment.…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Henderson v. ShinsekiSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  2. Dorsey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  3. Morris W. Gordon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
  4. United States v. Manuel Concepcion, Roberto Aponte, and Nelson FriasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
  5. Beck v. PrupisSupreme Court of the United States · 2000

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. SchlickCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2019
  2. Taylor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
  3. State v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2024
  4. 75-80 Properties v. Rale, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2019
  5. 75-80 Properties v. Rale, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2019

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API