Rosales v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtGetty, J.
In this case we are asked to determine whether a witness' prior convictions for committing a violent crime in aid of racketeering in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1959 ("VICAR offenses") are admissible for witness impeachment under Maryland Rule 5-609. Specifically, the Defendant sought to impeach the State's witness with the witness' conviction of conspiracy to commit assault with a dangerous weapon in aid of racketeering and threatening to commit a crime of violence in aid of racketeering. We hold that a witness' prior convictions for VICAR offenses are admissible for witness impeachment.…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Henderson v. ShinsekiSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Dorsey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
- Morris W. Gordon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
- United States v. Manuel Concepcion, Roberto Aponte, and Nelson FriasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Beck v. PrupisSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. SchlickCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2019
- Taylor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
- State v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2024
- 75-80 Properties v. Rale, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2019
- 75-80 Properties v. Rale, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2019
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.