Legal Opinion

Engesether v. Great Northern Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 19, 1896No. Nos. 9872-(149)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal by defendant from an oyder of the district court for Polk county, Ives, J., denying a motion for a new trial, after a verdict in favor of plaintiff for $130.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

Plaintiffs several causes of action all fall under two general heads: First, the failure of defendant on two occasions to furnish him, at the times agreed, cars in which to ship cattle from McIntosh to South St. Paul; second, unreasonable and negligent delay, on both occasions, in the transportation of the cattle after they were shipped. The defendant, by its answer, denied all the allegations of the complaint except the receipt of the cattle from plaintiff for shipment as alleged, and, as a further defense, set up the provisions of the written contract (Exhibit A) under which the cattle were…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. HarrisTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Smitha v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadTennessee Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Houtz v. Union Pac. R.Utah Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Carpenter v. Eastern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
  3. Missouri, K. & T. R. Co. v. ChowningSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  4. Mulrooney, Ryan & Clark Co. v. Western Transit Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
  5. Rupp v. ShafferButler Circuit Court · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API