Legal Opinion
Carpenter v. Eastern Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 14, 1897No. Nos. 10,275—(189)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Appeal by defendant from an order of tbe municipal court of Duluth, Boyle, J., denying a motion for a new trial.
1Opinion of the Court
START, O. J.
The plaintiff, on August 2, 1894, at Duluth in this state, delivered to the defendant 10 horses, to be transported to Minto, N. D., pursuant to a stock-shipping contract, similar to the contract considered by this court in the case of Engesether v. Great Northern R. Co., 65 Minn. 168, 68 N. W. 4. This action was brought to recover damages for injuries to the horses caused by the negligence of the defendant in unreasonably delaying the transportation *189of the horses and in the unnecessarily violent handling of the train on which they were carried. Verdict for the plaintiff for the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Wilson v. Minnesota Farmers' Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
- Duncan v. KohlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
- Engesether v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
- Greene v. DwyerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
3Cited by3 opinions
- Houtz v. Union Pac. R.Utah Supreme Court · 1908
- Pope v. Wisconsin Central Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- Mulrooney, Ryan & Clark Co. v. Western Transit Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1907