Legal Opinion

Rupp v. Shaffer

Butler Circuit Court

Decided January 15, 1901Published

Error to the Court of Common Pleas of Butler county.

1Opinion of the CourtJelke, J.

In the court below the plaintiff’s decedent was the serv- ■ ant, and the defendant the master and the proprietor of a •slaughter house. The former had sole charge of the process •of rendering lard and of the tank used for that purpose. The tank was cylindrical, eight feet high,about.four feet in -diameter, standing upright with the bottom of the tank about three feet above the floor. The decedent usually Aided this tank, when about to render lard, with fats put in at-*644the top, closed up the tank, and the contents were cooked by steam, then drawn out through a pipe and the cracklings were then…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hough v. Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Smiley v. BarkerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1897
  3. Manley v. Minneapolis Paint Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
  4. Engesether v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  5. Knuth v. Geo. A. Weiss Malting & Elevator Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API