Legal Opinion
Feldman v. Amos and Andy
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided February 12, 1934No. Patent Appeal 3203PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BLAND, Associate Judge.
Appellant has here appealed from the decision of the Commissioner of Patents, affirming the decision of the Examiner of Trade-mark Interferences, denying to appellant the right to register the trade-mark “Amos V Andy” for work shirts, which mark had been used by appellant on such merchandise since January 1, 1930.
Appellees opposed the registration of said alleged trade-mark, and state in their notice of opposition that Charles, J. Correll and Freeman F. Gosden are members of the firm of Amos and Andy, and that said Cor-rell and Gosden are doing business as a firm under…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- American Steel Foundries v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Brown Chemical Co. v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Duro Pump & Mfg. Co. v. California Cedar Products Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1926
- Investor Pub. Co. v. DobinsonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California · 1896
- Tinker v. M. F. Patterson Dental Supply Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- The Fleischmann Distilling Corp., a Corporation, Etc. v. Maier Brewing Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- Safeway Stores, Inc. v. DunnellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
- Silverman v. CBS INC.District Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- Uproar Co. v. National Broadcasting Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1934
- Holly Molding Devices v. Esquire, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1945
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.