Duro Pump & Mfg. Co. v. California Cedar Products Co.
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
ROBB, Associate Justice.
Appeal from a decision of the Patent Office in a trademark proceeding brought by the Duro Pump & Manufacturing Company, hereinafter called the Duro Company, and opposing the registration by the California Cedar Produets Company of the word “Duro” as a trademark.
The Patent Office tribunals ruled that the goods of the respective parties possessed different descriptive properties, and that the word “Duro,” having been written by applicant in such a peculiar way as not to constitute "merely” the distinguishing word in the corporate name of the opposer, was registerable.
The…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- American Steel Foundries v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
3Cited by10 opinions
- California Packing Corporation v. Tillman & BendelCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
- Sun-Maid Raisin Growers of California v. American Grocer Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
- Tidy-House Paper Products, Inc. v. Tidy House Products Co. (Iowa). Tidy House Products Co. (Iowa) v. Tidy-House Paper Products, IncCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
- Ford Motor Co. v. Ford Insecticide CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1947
- Feldman v. Amos and AndyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1934
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.