Legal Opinion

Duro Pump & Mfg. Co. v. California Cedar Products Co.

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided February 1, 1926No. 1764PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBB, Associate Justice.

Appeal from a decision of the Patent Office in a trademark proceeding brought by the Duro Pump & Manufacturing Company, hereinafter called the Duro Company, and opposing the registration by the California Cedar Produets Company of the word “Duro” as a trademark.

The Patent Office tribunals ruled that the goods of the respective parties possessed different descriptive properties, and that the word “Duro,” having been written by applicant in such a peculiar way as not to constitute "merely” the distinguishing word in the corporate name of the opposer, was registerable.

The…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. American Steel Foundries v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1926

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. California Packing Corporation v. Tillman & BendelCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
  2. Sun-Maid Raisin Growers of California v. American Grocer Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
  3. Tidy-House Paper Products, Inc. v. Tidy House Products Co. (Iowa). Tidy House Products Co. (Iowa) v. Tidy-House Paper Products, IncCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
  4. Ford Motor Co. v. Ford Insecticide CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1947
  5. Feldman v. Amos and AndyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1934

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API