Investor Pub. Co. v. Dobinson
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California
1Opinion of the Court
WELLBORN, District Judge.
The bill of complaint, to which defendants have interposed a general demurrer, alleges, in substance, that the plaintiff is a corporation formed and existing under the laws of the state of Massachusetts, and the defendant company a corporation formed and existing under the laws of-the state of California; that, for more than five years last past, plaintiff has published, and still publishes, in the city of Boston, state of Massachusetts, and iii the city of Philadelphia, state of Pennsylvania, a weekly trade and financial journal, named “United States Investor”; that…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Manufacturing Co. v. TrainerSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Goodyear's India Rubber Glove Manufacturing Co. v. Goodyear Rubber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Amoskeag Manufacturing Co. v. SpearThe Superior Court of New York City · 1849
- Celluloid Manuf'g Co. v. Cellonite Manuf'g Co.United States Circuit Court · 1887
- Koehler v. . SandersNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Peck Bros. & Co. v. Peck Bros.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1902
- Bissell Chilled Plow Works v. T. M. Bissell Plow Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Michigan · 1902
- Consolidated Home Specialties Co. v. PlotkinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- National Bank in North Kansas City v. Bank of North Kansas CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1943
- Investor Pub. Co. of Massachusetts v. DobinsonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California · 1897
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.