Legal Opinion

In Re Booth

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 9, 1919No. Crim. No. 882PublishedCited by 3 opinions

APPLICATION for a Writ of Habeas Corpus. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This is an application for a writ of hateas corpus. The petitioner, who is confined in the California state prison at San Quentin, was sentenced by the superior court, in and for the county of Butte, on Septem ber 24, 1917, “for the indeterminate term of one to fourteen years, ’ ’ after having entered a plea of guilty to the crime of forgery, committed on the eighteenth day of June, 1917, before the indeterminate sentence law of this state went into effect. Thereafter, and pursuant to the personal request of the petitioner, the court made an order for his return into court, to the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re LeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  2. People v. BoothCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. Lee LimUtah Supreme Court · 1932
  2. In Re MartinezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. In Re PasserelloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API