Legal Opinion

Volentine v. Bechtel, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Texas

Decided November 19, 1998No. 1:98CV1609(TH)PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND OPINION ORDER

HEARTFIELD, District Judge.

Before this Court is Bechtel, Inc.’s and Mobil Chemical Company’s Motion for Summary Judgment [14]. Having considered the motion, the response, and the reply to the response, this Court hereby GRANTS Bechtel, Inc.’s and Mobil Chemical Company’s Motion for Summary Judgment [14].

1. Facts

The autumn of 1996 brought together Bechtel, Inc. (“Bechtel”), Mobil Chemical Company — a division of Mobil Oil Corporation (“Mobil”), and some three hundred and eight (308) individual plaintiffs who bring this lawsuit. In August 1996, Mobil began work on…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Little v. Liquid Air Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  5. San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. MVM INC. v. RodriguezDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2008
  2. Hill v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
  3. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. United Food & Commercial Workers International UnionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  4. Cool Wind Ventilation Corp. v. Sheet Metal Workers International Ass'n, Local Union No. 28District Court, E.D. New York · 2001
  5. Walmart Stores, Inc. v. United Food & Commercial Workers Int'l Union, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API