Legal Opinion

Ronkosky v. City of Tacoma

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 1912No. 10521PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeals from judgments of the superior court for Pierce county, Clifford, J., entered December 13, 1911, dismissing actions for injury to property, upon granting nonsuits.

1Opinion of the CourtEllis, J.

These two actions were, by stipulation of the parties, tried together. A motion for nonsuit was sustained as to each case; and from that order and judgments of dismissal thereon, the plaintiffs in both cases have appealed. By further stipulation, both cases are here for consideration upon the same statement of facts.

Where Steele street and North 29th street, in the city of Tacoma, intersect, there is a deep gulch, in the bottom of which flows a perennial stream, carrying a small amount of water in the summer time, but a much larger volume in the rainy season. Years ago, the city graded 29th…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Cass v. DicksWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  2. The Rochester White Lead Co. v. . the City of RochesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1850
  3. Wood v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Ross v. City of MadisonIndiana Supreme Court · 1849
  5. Mootry v. Town of DanburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1878

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Colella v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Gaines v. Pierce CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
  3. Island County v. MacKieCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
  4. Papac v. City of MontesanoWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Nelson v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1918

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API