Legal Opinion

Katz v. Wessel

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1955PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthew M. Levy, J.

Gertrude Katz is the wife of Ludwig Katz. Ludwig is an employee of Pacific Hardware Corp. Pacific owns an automobile. Wessel (not connected with Ludwig or the latter’s wife or employer) also owns an automobile. On a certain occasion, the two automobiles collided. At the time of the impact, Wessel was driving his car. At that time, Ludwig was operating Pacific’s vehicle (with his employer’s permission) and with his wife as a passenger (also with his employer’s permission). Gertrude and Ludwig were injured and the Pacific vehicle was damaged. Litigation followed. Gertrude sued Pacific and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fuchs v. London & Lancashire Indemnity Co. of AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
  2. Standard Accident Insurance v. NewmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944
  3. Feinman v. Bernard Rice Sons, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
  4. Kane v. Kane Ship Repair Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1952

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Jacobs v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.New York Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Peka, Inc. v. KayeNew York Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Smith v. Employer's Fire InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1972
  4. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp. v. KatzNew York Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. DeLoshNew York Supreme Court · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API