Legal Opinion
Jacobs v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 24, 1956PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFelix C. Benvenga, J.
Plaintiff moves for summary judgment under rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice. The action is on a public liability insurance policy issued by defendant to Dave Jacobs and Max Jacobs, doing business as Tivoli French Shoppe, Borough of Manhattan, City of New York.
In March, 1952 plaintiff suffered injuries on the premises of Tivoli Shoppe and instituted an action in negligence against David Jacobs, one of the partners, charging him with negli*430gence. Plaintiff did not sue Max Jacobs, the other partner. Concededly, Max Jacobs is plaintiff’s husband and David Jacobs her brother-in-law.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hartol Products Corp. v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
- Schubert v. August Schubert Wagon Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Morgan v. Greater New York Taxpayers Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
- Caplan v. CaplanNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
- Fuchs v. London & Lancashire Indemnity Co. of AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Coffindaffer v. CoffindafferWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1978
- Shook v. CrabbSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
- Raisen v. RaisenSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
- Eule v. Eule Motor SalesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
- Hatzinicolas v. ProtopapasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.