Legal Opinion

United States v. Alabama

District Court, N.D. Alabama

Decided March 16, 1984No. Civ. A. No. CV 83-C-1676-SPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON MOTIONS FOR RECUSAL

DYER, Senior Circuit Judge, Sitting by Designation.

The United States instituted this action against the State of Alabama and its state institutions of higher learning, including Auburn University, alleging that the defendants are maintaining and perpetuating racial segregation. The case was routinely and randomly assigned to Judge U.W. Clemon. Auburn University and Wayne Teague, the State Education Commissioner, filed motions to disqualify Judge Clemon pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 144 and 455.

Judge Clemon did not reach the sufficiency of the affidavits’ averments but…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. Melvin R. Laird, Secretary of Defense v. Arlo TatumSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Mitsui Shintaku Ginko K. K., Tokyo v. DodgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. In Re United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. Salamone, SalvatoreCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
  2. Ex Parte Monsanto Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  3. Adkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1991
  4. Knight v. State of Ala.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1991
  5. Palais Royal, Inc. v. Partida, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API