Legal Opinion
Calderon v. U.S. District Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 20, 1996No. 96-70729PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Per curiam
Arthur Calderon, Warden of the California State Prison at San Quentin, and James Gomez, Director of the California Department of Corrections, (Petitioners) seek a -writ of mandamus directing the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California to grant Petitioners’ motion for summary dismissal of 32 claims in an action of habeas corpus brought against Petitioners by Blufford Hayes, Jr. (Hayes), a prisoner at San Quentin prison. In its April 10, 1996 order, the district court denied the Petitioners’ motion for summary dismissal of Hayes’ claims, holding that although the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Kerr v. United States Dist. Court for Northern Dist. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Ford v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- In Re ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Holly W. BAUMAN Et Al., Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, Respondent, Union Oil Company, Real Party in InterestCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- In Re DixonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Cary Williams v. Timothy FilsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9269, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 15,299 Arthur Calderon, Warden, and James Gomez, Director of the California Department of Corrections v. U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California (Sacramento), Blufford Hayes, Jr., Real Party in InterestCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996