Commonwealth v. Gleason
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ZAPPALA, Justice.
We granted allowance of appeal in this case to determine whether an arresting officer possesses reasonable and articu-lable grounds to believe that a licensee violated a provision of the Vehicle Code, warranting the stop of the licensee’s car, based upon his observations that the licensee’s vehicle crossed the berm line by six to eight inches on two occasions' for a period of a second or two over a distance of approximately one quarter of a mile. The Superior'Court held that under these circumstances, an arresting officer is justified in stopping the licensee. ’
*113As a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Commonwealth v. BosurgiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Commonwealth v. SwangerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Commonwealth v. HamlinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Commonwealth v. MurraySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by86 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ChaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Commonwealth v. FeczkoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Commonwealth v. HolmesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Commonwealth v. SalterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Commonwealth v. LindblomSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.