Commonwealth v. Murray
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
NIX, Justice.
The appellant was arrested and subsequently charged on two counts of burglary, conspiracy, possession of burglary tools, receiving stolen goods and larceny. Prior to trial, a Motion to Suppress was denied. The appellant was found guilty by a jury of burglary and possession of burglary tools and after the denial of post-trial motions, sentence was imposed. On appeal, the Superior Court, being equally divided, the judgment of sentence was affirmed. Commonwealth v. Murray, 226 Pa.Super. 101, 313 A.2d 293 (1973). Allocatur was then granted by this Court and we now…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Draper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by103 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ChaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Commonwealth v. FeczkoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Commonwealth v. TarbertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Commonwealth v. HolmesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Commonwealth v. LopezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.