Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Feczko

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 22, 2010No. 2028 MDA 2009PublishedCited by 206 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

BENDER, J.:

David Feczko (Appellant) appeals from the judgment of sentence entered following his convictions for DUI-General Impairment, DUI-Highest Rate, and Driving on Roadways Laned for Traffic. See 75 Pa.C.S. §§ 3802(a)(1), (c), 3309(1). Appellant contends that the suppression court erred in denying Appellant’s motion to suppress, which challenged the basis of the traffic stop. We conclude that the stop was legal because the officer had probable cause to believe that Appellant had committed a vehicle code violation. Accordingly, we affirm.

The relevant facts and procedural history…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Commonwealth v. ChaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  4. Commonwealth v. MurraySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Commonwealth v. GleasonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by206 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SalterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  2. Commonwealth v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  3. Commonwealth v. SandersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  4. Commonwealth v. LandisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  5. Commonwealth v. HarrisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

201 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API