Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 2013No. S-12-966PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nebraska Advance Sheets STATE v. SMITH 77 Cite as

286 Neb. 77

unauthorized practice of law under the definition set forth in § 3-1001(E) and falls within the general prohibition of § 3-1003 applicable to nonlawyers such as Hansen. Although the Commission did not specifically allege in its petition that Hansen was engaged in the unauthorized practice of law by holding himself out as being authorized to practice law, that fact is implicit in its allegations that Hansen had been giv­ ing legal advice to others. And we note that despite having an opportunity to do so, Hansen did not file exceptions…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Houston v. LackSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. State v. KipfNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State v. HessNebraska Supreme Court · 2001
  4. State v. ParmarNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Licht v. Association Services, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. State v. DraperNebraska Supreme Court · 2015
  2. State v. LantzNebraska Supreme Court · 2015
  3. State v. CrawfordNebraska Supreme Court · 2015
  4. State v. NoltNebraska Supreme Court · 2018
  5. State v. BerneyNebraska Supreme Court · 2014

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API