Legal Opinion

Andrews v. City of Winter Haven

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided September 13, 1941PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTerrell, J.

On May 1, 1933, the City of Winter Haven had a bonded debt of more than two million dollars, much of wbdeh was in default. For the purpose of refunding such indebtedness refunding bonds in the sum of $2,148,054.78, designated as City of Winter Haven General Refunding Bonds, Issue of 1933, Series “A” and “B” were authorized and issued.

Series “A” bonds were for the purpose of refunding the original bonds of the City bearing six per cent interest and Series “B” bonds were for the purpose of refunding the original bonds of the City bearing five and one half per cent interest. All bonds of both…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Taylor v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Florida · 1940
  2. Outman v. ConeSupreme Court of Florida · 1939
  3. Taylor v. Williams, W. J. Howey Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Florida · 1940

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Meredith v. Winter HavenSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. City of Oldsmar v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
  3. Meredith v. City of Winter HavenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1943
  4. Meredith v. City of Winter HavenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1944
  5. Renicks v. City of Lake WorthSupreme Court of Florida · 1944

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API